Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-14 04:34:14 EDT --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > 1) why URL still drafts url? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell Added a comment > 2) just a suggestion. How about using package name as haskell-packager? Still thinking on this - added a comment in spec - I need to look at some other packages for examples. > 3) Can it be possible to have all those Source files be tarred and released > with license file on fedorapeople currently till you get fedorahosted page? Done (but untested:) > 4) spec templates can be installed in /etc/rpmdevtools location instead to go > for some %{_datadir}/%{name} location. Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review