Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-13 19:26:20 EDT --- Good questions: > 1) why URL still drafts url? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell Yeah it is kind of a chicken'n'egg kind of situation. Actually I didn't follow the whole process of fontpackages wrt FPC (Fedora Packaging Committee) and the recent revision of the Fonts Packaging Guidelines: the files in the package are really part of the new Haskell Packaging Draft so it would probably make sense for them to be looked at by FPC as part of the Haskell Packaging Guidelines revision process. > 2) just a suggestion. How about using package name as haskell-packager? Hmm maybe the rpm macros and the templates should be separated then. There are more rpm bits (scripts) coming for dependency generation. I could move the spec templating part to haskell-packager: in the longer term we would probably like to rewrite/replace it with something in Haskell (like cabal2rpm). > 3) Can it be possible to have all those Source files be tarred and released > with license file on fedorapeople currently till you get fedorahosted page? Yeah, before doing that I just wanted to put it out for discussion first. :) Currently it is really small though and I doubt any other non-derived distro would be interested in the templates anyway so I was half-naively thinking that it could even just live in pkg cvs but that would probably be frowned upon these days? > 4) spec templates can be installed in /etc/rpmdevtools location instead to go > for some %{_datadir}/%{name} location. Good point: I will change that. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review