Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ajackson@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ajackson@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-07 13:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Indeed, but not a tarball for libGLw, a tarball for Mesa, so it's dubious > to use the same source, Mesa-*.tar.bz2 for 2 distinct srpms. It is not > explicitly forbidden but I consider it bad practice. Maybe another reviewer > could accept that practice, or as I said above we could also ask on the > fedora-extras-list for advice. Mesa has no intention of splitting out libGLw. Mesa's packaging lacks for many things; this is one of them. Updated spec and srpm in the same place as before: Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/fedora/libGLw/libGLw.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/fedora/libGLw/libGLw-1.0-1.src.rpm I think I've addressed everything by now. I hope. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review