Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478581 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2009-01-01 14:22:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Lubomir, can you please add the license to %doc of the base package? I know, > it is in the header file of -devel as well, but that's not perfect IMHO. So > just the license for %doc, not the whole header file. Maybe the license just > from the header file as Source2 simply. That can't be done, see [1]. And given the size of the package and license being included in the header I don't think it would make sense to make upstream distribute one more file with a copy of the license. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pnglite Short Description: A lightweight C library for loading PNG images Owners: lkundrak, cassmodiah Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review