[Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630


toshio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |toshio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From toshio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-08-05 16:38 EST -------
Please don't guess what the license of a package is.  Falsely representing the
license may expose you to legal liability.  It will almost certainly make the
package's author upset.  If there is no license on the upstream distribution,
then the package is not free (either free as in freedom or as in beer) but is
instead a  fully copyrighted work which you have no license to distribute or
modify.  If you think this is not what the author intended then you have to ask
the author to clarify the licensing terms.  The best way they can do that (from
a packager's perspective) is by putting a license file into the package.

In this case, the upstream author has enclosed license terms.  Look inside the
source code for it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]