Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From cfeist@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-03 15:43 EST ------- In response to Comment #2 - Summary isn't capitalized because I was using the kernel module package guidlines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules). The line they show is what I'm using: Summary: %{kmod_name} kernel modules - Changelog has been added - kmodtool needs to have that permission because it is script that is run from the .spec file - The .spec file does end in .spec, I'm not sure why this is an error. - According to the kernel module specification, the name of the module should be specified this way: (which it is) Name: %{kmod_name}-kmod - This package will most likely never be in the mainstream kernel as it provides support for GFS1 and we are only attempting to get GFS2 into the kernel. - The userspace utilities are in gfs-utils, I'll get those in the proper format according to the kernel module package guidlines. In response to comment #3 & #4 - I've updated the kmodtool (from comment #5) this should work better now. - Unfortunately utsrelease.h has the data that we need (#define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.17-1.2462.fc6"), uts.h doesn't. In response to comment #5 - I've put kmodtool back to the original, I had made modifications to get it to work with an earlier version of the .spec file, and no longer needed those modifications. New SRPM/spec are here: http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-kmod-0.1.0-1.2.6.17_1.2505.fc6.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-kernel.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review