Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2006-07-31 02:36 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for rawhide i386 is failed with No package 'clips-6' found is clips-6 is in extras? I found only clips package but not clips-6 in extras * MUST Items: - dist tag is present. - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - The spec file name matching the base package clipsmm, in the format clipsmm.spec. - This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - The spec file for the package is legible. - The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - This package includes License file COPYING. - This source package includes the text of the license in its own file,and that file, containing the text of the license for the package is included in %doc. - The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (275cc041b5c0a28903ccace1d896fc33 clipsmm-0.0.4.tar.bz2) - This package did not containd any ExcludeArch. - This package have a correct %clean section. - This package used macros. - Document files are included. - Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. Also, * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * I did not test package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review