Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199797 ------- Additional Comments From wart@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-30 20:20 EST ------- GOOD ==== * rpmlint output clean * package and spec file named appropriately * spec file legible and in Am. English * GPL license ok, license file included * Compiles in mock on FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64, * No extra BR: * Source matches upstream: 660447c44af5cee7543de57cc9dcafc6 auriferous-1.0.1.tar.bz2 * No locales * No shared libaries * Not relocatable * RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned where necessary * macro usage consistent * Contains code and permissible content (game data) * No need for -doc subpackage * No need for -devel subpackage * .desktop file installed correctly * Does not own directories that it should not. * Runs on FC5-i386 MUSTFIX ======= * Missing BR: libpng-devel, or is this supposed to be pulled in automatically by ClanLib06-devel? SHOULD ====== * Too many smileys in the %description. * Consider moving %{_datadir}/auriferous to a -data subpackage NOTES ===== * The display size is slightly larger than my 800x600 setup, making it somewhat awkward. I didn't see any in-game options to change the display size, is that possible? * What's the difference between playerr.png in the tarball and your modified playerr.png? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review