Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-29 18:52 EST ------- > Would this be not better suited to Development/Libraries? I'm not sure. Most of the other libraries, similar to papyrus (gtkmm24, libglademm26, libxml++, libgnomemm, et. al.) are under System Environment/ Libraries. Maybe they're behind and need to be changed? > Need R: cairomm The cairomm requires gets picked up by rpmbuild as a library requires. > I seriously doubt it will need anything past cairomm-devel The papyrusgtk stuff will need gtkmm, and theres no dependency chain between cairomm and gtkmm. pkgconfig is there since the autoconf configure requires it to find gtkmm and cairomm. > %{__cp} -arv docs/reference . > %{__cp} -arv docs/gallery . > > Should these not be included in the %docs part of %files? > %doc ChangeLog reference gallery > > This is confusing me. You've already copied reference and gallary somewhere - > why have you got this? This is done to move them into position so they appear in a better position for the rpm. In the dist they're in: docs/www/reference/ If I include them in the rpm without cp'ing they'd install as: /usr/share/doc/papyrus-0.2.0-devel/docs/www/reference/ Doing it this way they install as: /usr/share/doc/papyrus-0.2.0-devel/reference/ > %files > %{_libdir}/lib*.so.* > %files devel > %{_bindir}/*-demo The main reason I've done these is because I'm upstream on several libraries and I've tried to generalize the templates a bit to make them maintainable by autoconf (autoconf actually generates the specs). I know it's a little general, but it allows me to apply one correction to all the specs related to the libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review