Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-29 18:13 EST ------- Group: System Environment/Libraries Would this be not better suited to Development/Libraries? System Environment/Libs are really for the likes of glibc et al. Need R: cairomm %package devel Requires: gtkmm24-devel >= 2.8.0 cairomm-devel >= 0.6.0 pkgconfig doxygen graphviz Once installed, do rpm -qa --requires <package-name>. This will give you the requires for main and devel packages to run correctly. I seriously doubt it will need anything past cairomm-devel %install %{__cp} -arv docs/reference . %{__cp} -arv docs/gallery . Should these not be included in the %docs part of %files? If they're not, where are they supposed to be getting copied to? Are the permissions being kept correctly? %files %{_libdir}/lib*.so.* Niggle. How many libraries are being installed? If it's one, just expand it. This makes reading the spec for us poor reviewers much simpler. If it's a pile which can be globbed together, then %{_libdir}/libpap*.so.* is also okay. %files devel %{_bindir}/*-demo I'd strongly recommend naming this %doc ChangeLog reference gallery This is confusing me. You've already copied reference and gallary somewhere - why have you got this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review