[Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221





------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxx  2006-07-23 16:42 EST -------
Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio.spec
SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio-0.9.3-2.src.rpm

Updated with Toshio's patch.

About the versioning... The reason we have versions on libs is so that:

 a) We can have multiple versions of a lib on the system.
 b) If we break ABI, applications depending on this lib won't be able to load it
as it will have a different ver.

Now apply this to libpulsedsp.so and you'll see that neither matters. The
primary reason being that the only "user" of the lib is the padsp script that
needs to know the name when setting up the LD_PRELOAD variable. However, as the
two are part of one package, there is no need for version handling. Adding it
would be the equivalent of versioning glade files for every GTK application.

If a valid case for versions presents itself, then I'll gladly support adding
it. But if it is only to shut up an incorrect warning, then things should stay
the way they are upstream.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]