Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-21 20:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Created an attachment (id=132852) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132852&action=view) [edit] > patch spec to remove static libs and fix rpath breakage > > Here's a spec patch for two of the issues. It removes static libraries and > fixes rpath. Note that some of the files in the modules directory, > %{_libdir}/pulse-0.9/modules, need to have an rpath to that directory because > they have dependencies on other shared objects in there. Before, they had a > second rpath set on /usr/lib64 which was wrong. Also, some of the modules do > not have dependencies on anything within that directory. Therefore, they > should have no rpath set. This patch should make all of that happy (and > rpmlint should no longer complain about rpaths.) The patch succesfully fixes the compile issue I pointed out earlier, thank you very much. Any hope of getting gst-pulse packaged as well so pulseaudio will be more useful on a default FC desktop? (http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/gst-pulse/) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review