Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-20 07:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #3) > How strongly the application and its data are tied varies in vtk's past. > Currently it is quite high, as both got a simultaneous minor release. Either data files are subpackages of an application, then they should go to below an application owned directory (data as internal implementation detail) or they are independent of the application, then they should go to outside of the applications directories. If they require a certain API, such data should go to API versioned directories. In none of these cases parallel installation of data files makes any sense. Also, upstream ships its data in an unversioned directory, which I read as a strong indication of them not wanting a versioned directory. > Ignoring actual user demand which is acknowledged by upstream development and > even implemneted isn't really constructive. 1. Show us an URL were upstream explicitly says so. I searched their web site and could not find any such statement. 2. User demand? Whose? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review