Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-20 06:56 EST ------- > (In reply to comment #3) > > One of recent features of vtk was to allow for several concurrent vtkdata > > installs due to user demand and be able to switch back and forth. > A versioned data dir would be useful if there is a strong dependency between > application and application data, and if the application is supposed to be > installed in parallel. > > But I don't see how this applies here. How strongly the application and its data are tied varies in vtk's past. Currently it is quite high, as both got a simultaneous minor release. (In reply to comment #4) > > I don't intend to ever have a second package coinstall a different data set, > > but if the user wants to do so, I'd like to avoid any conflicts and be > > verbose on filesytem level about what is actually on the system. > > I regret having to say this, but I refuse to approve this package in its > current shape. Now I'm going to break out in tears ;) Ignoring actual user demand which is acknowledged by upstream development and even implemneted isn't really constructive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review