Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-19 09:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > That is a bug, your package should _not_ own a system directory that > is part of the X Window System. Here's a list of all packages in FC5 which own that directory: xscreensaver-base xorg-x11-resutils xorg-x11-server-utils xorg-x11-utils xorg-x11-xsm xorg-x11-apps xorg-x11-xdm Mike, if you think these are buggy, I'll happily file bugs against them. Honestly, I think it's reasonable to see that list and conclude that it's expected behavior for a package that adds an app-defaults file to own /usr/share/X11/app-defaults. Jochen, do you think it would be reasonable to back out of this mess by just adding a dependency on xterm? That's what the app-defaults file is for, isn't it? In FC6, the xterm dependency will pull in libXt which will own this directory; in FC5 the directory will still be unowned in the dependency tree but at least that's not a bug in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review