Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-19 09:17 EST ------- Michael, you don't need to be sponsored to review a package, you only need to open up an account on admin.fedora.redhat.com/accounts/ On the comments by both (thanks for the fast replies!): o ftp.hungry.com has been often bad for me, too. Have you tried accessing the file (not the folder) directly? o BuildRoot as quoted is the "preferred buildroot" which doesn't really make sense. I submitted a request to review the guidelines on this. But as a _preferred_ entry this is considered a SHOULD, not MUST. o %{?_smp_mflags} should be used IMO if one really knows the package builds as such. I have been bitten by too many Makefiles that didn't build in parallel. As the ordering is non-deterministic there is noooo way to find out other then reviewing the Makefiles themselves. That may make sense on large packages of the size of openoffice, but for a tiny package the review and risk of Makefile bugs isn't worth the few CPU cycles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review