[Bug 199402] Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402





------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-07-19 09:17 EST -------
Michael, you don't need to be sponsored to review a package, you only need to
open up an account on admin.fedora.redhat.com/accounts/

On the comments by both (thanks for the fast replies!):
o ftp.hungry.com has been often bad for me, too. Have you tried accessing the file 
  (not the folder) directly?
o BuildRoot as quoted is the "preferred buildroot" which doesn't really make
  sense. I submitted a request to review the guidelines on this. But as a
  _preferred_ entry this is considered a SHOULD, not MUST. 
o %{?_smp_mflags} should be used IMO if one really knows the package builds as 
  such. I have been bitten by too many Makefiles that didn't build in parallel.
  As the ordering is non-deterministic there is noooo way to find out other then
  reviewing the Makefiles themselves. That may make sense on large packages of
  the size of openoffice, but for a tiny package the review and risk of Makefile
  bugs isn't worth the few CPU cycles.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]