Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-23 16:39 EST ------- Hi Jason, thanks for your comments. I've updated a new spec file and SRPM here: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/ht2html.spec http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/ht2html-2.0-1jpp_2fc.src.rpm > Please just use a plain integer for the release number. This package is taken from jpackage.org, and I'd like to keep the versioning consistent with theirs. Is the non-numeric release a big problem here? > I suggest not compressing ht2html; it saves all of eleven bytes makes > maintanence incrementally nore difficult. Done. > Source0: isn't a URL, and in addition that source file isn't available from > upstream. (They only supply a .gz file.) Suggest using > http://dl.sf.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Done. > Please don't use Vendor or Distribution. Done. > I'm not sure why you have BR: python-devel; this package just copies files into > place. You're right, done. > > I can find no information indicating that this software is in the public domain. > Can you provide a reference? There seems to be no mention of licensing in the software itself, but I found mention of in the sourceforge net. However, rpmlint tells me that both 'Python License' and '' are invalid. Is there a cannonical way to call this license? > RPM will compile all of the .py files; you will need to %ghost the .pyo files > which are generated. I've %ghosted the .pyo files, and listed *.py and *.pyc files as seperate entries in the %files section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review