[Bug 193478] Review Request: wordpress - database driven blogging software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wordpress - database driven blogging software


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193478





------- Additional Comments From jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-06-19 22:25 EST -------
One thing I forgot to mention: the way you specify all the files is a matter of preference, but if you're 
going to list them all out rather than simply having a single line '%{_datadir}/wordpress/', you must also 
have a line '%dir %{_datadir}/wordpress/' so that the created directories are also owned by the package.

Also note that the symlink %{_datadir}/wordpress/wp-config.php shouldn't be marked as a config file, 
and symlinks generally should be relative, rather than absolute (otherwise they're hanging within the 
buildroot).

Ah, the wordpress-httpd-conf file needs /var/www/wordpress replaced with /usr/share/wordpress.

Personally, I'd also just do away with the '%define installdir %{_datadir}' and simply replace all cases of %
{installdir} with %{_datadir}, because it just adds unnecessary and non-standard cruft.

Additional review details:

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines: okay
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently: my only beef on that is 
the now unnecessary use of %{installdir}
* dist tag is present: okay
* build root is correct.
      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n): okay
* license field matches the actual license: GPL, okay
* license is open source-compatible, license text included in package: okay
* source files match upstream: okay
      $ md5sum latest.tar.gz wordpress-2.0.3.tar.gz
        0ad0696351cba9ef9b4a3dd97b1f327b  latest.tar.gz
        0ad0696351cba9ef9b4a3dd97b1f327b  wordpress-2.0.3.tar.gz
* latest version is being packaged: v2.0.3, okay
* BuildRequires are proper: okay
* package builds in mock: okay (fedora development, x86_64)
* rpmlint is silent: not quite yet, it complains about /usr/share/wordpress/wp-config.php being 
marked as a config file
* final provides and requires are sane: okay
    wordpress-2.0.3-1.fc6.noarch.rpm
    config(wordpress) = 2.0.3-1.fc6
    wordpress = 2.0.3-1.fc6
    =
    config(wordpress) = 2.0.3-1.fc6
    httpd  
    mysql-server  
    php >= 4.1.

* no shared libraries are present: okay
* package is not relocatable: okay
* owns the directories it creates: not yet, need to add /usr/share/wordpress to %files
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't: okay
* no duplicates in %files: okay
* file permissions are appropriate: okay
* %clean is present: okay
* %check is present and all tests pass: n/a
* no scriptlets present: okay
* code, not content: okay
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary: okay
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package: okay
* no headers: okay
* no pkgconfig files: okay
* no libtool .la files: okay
* not a GUI app: okay
* not a web app: okay


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]