Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conman - the console manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194563 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-19 09:41 EST ------- You don't have to be sponsored to do package reviews, being sponsored is only necessary to submit and maintain your own packages in extras. Doing reviews *before* getting sponsored is actually encouraged, as it helps potential sponsors better evaluate your understanding of packaging. As for the review, the only issue I see brought up is that there's no README, which isn't an acceptance blocker. I'm a little unclear as to whether you're saying that's the only thing missing or if you didn't see any documentation, but all documentation included in the upstream tarball is included in the rpm (except the INSTALL doc, which is irrelevant for an rpm). So basically, as I understand it, you don't see any problems with the package outside of the lack of an upstream README, and you actually *do* have the power to approve the package. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review