Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 ------- Additional Comments From hugo@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-14 14:12 EST ------- Hi guys, I have created the experimental specfile for the sub-package concept: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/fextras/kdegames.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/fextras/SRPMS/kdegames-3.5.3-3.src.rpm I made the specfile as clean and organized as possible. It creates 36 packages: one for common game files, one for devel files, one for card decks (used by lskat and kpat), one as a metapackage that requires all others and one for each game. Hope you all like it. It is indeed more difficult to maintain, but not that much. I think we get some good advantages for the users. And I know this because I've asked to 10+ Linux users (beginners and experienced) and they *all* said that this approach is better. Note: Since I don't have the 3.5.3 ready to install here, I have commented out the version requirements and using generic ones. In the spec you can note the "FIXME" warnings, these should be removed if you have these recent versions installed in the building machine. Rex: I'm thinking in helping co-maintain KDE packages or trying to create a maintainer group for these KDE packages, based on the SIG. I really look forward for KDE improvement in Fedora Core :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review