Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: q - Equational programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194519 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-10 15:49 EST ------- This is really a packaging of RC2, correct? I think it would be good to indicate that in the version. According to the naming guidelines, you should use q-7.1-0.1.rc2. and increment the second "1" for each RPM release until 7.1 is released, at which you can call it q-7.1-1. Unfortunately I'm having trouble building in mock: gcc -DYEAR=\"2006\" -DSYSINFO=\"x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu\" -DQPATH=\".:/usr/share/q/lib:/usr/lib64/q\" -DQEXEC=\"/usr/bin/q\" -DLIBTOOL=\"/usr/lib64/q/libtool\" -DCC=\"gcc\" -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buf fer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o qcc qcc-qcc.o qcc-qbase.o qcc-sys.o qcc-getopt.o qcc-getopt1.o -lgmp -lcrypt -lutil -lnsl -lm PATH=".:/usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin" QPATH="../stdlib:../modules/clib:../modules/clib" ./q ./qcwrap.q ./qcwrap.q def: error loading module Warning: 268 unresolved external symbols ! File def, line 297: Value mismatch in definition make[2]: *** [qcwrap.c] Error 2 Finally, with so many modules packaged, this package is probably giong to have a monster dependency list. Is it possible to split the packaging a bit? Or are you not building all of the modules listed in the %descsription? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review