Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curry - Münster Curry compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194011 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-10 15:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Ah yes, I tried this to so that uninstalling curry and curry-debugger > first uninstalls curry-debugger, so that the /usr/lib/curry directory > is not left behind. This didn't work out and I simply made curry-debugger > also own /usr/lib/curry. This is an rpm bug; there's a ticket open on it somewhere but there are so many rpm bugz that I can't find it right now. > However after giving some thought to the package splitting, I would > rather not split it after all. I don't really think it is necessary; it was just one of the ideas I tossed out. It's not the static+debug situation that Ralf mentioned earlier, it's just a library with additional stuff linked in. Remember, this is a development system > with an integrated debugger. A compiled binary doesn't need any runtime > library anymore, therefore the curry package isn't needed anymore either. > > I will however accept if your insist on it. > > > APPROVED > > > (In reply to comment #9) > > Oops, I just noticed that the debuginfo package came out empty. I don't see > > anything being stripped and the compiler is being called with -g so I'm not sure > > what's up here. Perhaps it's best to just disable the -debuginfo package > > generation. > I will try to find what's happening. > How is it disabled? > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review