Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-05-29 18:37 EST ------- rpmlint output: E: elektra configure-without-libdir-spec I don't understand this one. W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libelektra-default.so Safe to ignore - as long as having dlopened libs in /lib is accepted, as it is a link to a dlopened lib. E: elektra script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/elektra-0.6.1/scripts/convert-hwconfKudzu The shellbang should be #!/usr/bin/perl and if you want to avoid the dependency on perl, you should chmod -x E: elektra-devel no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libelektratools.so E: elektra-devel no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libelektra.so This should be acted upon (those should be symlinks and not files). E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-filesys.so libelektra-filesys.so E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-fstab.so libelektra-fstab.so E: elektra-backend-berkeleydb invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-berkeleydb.so libelektra-berkeleydb.so That's strange. They seems to me to be acceptable sonames for dlopened libs. Maybe it is an error that happens when dlopened libs are put in standard library directories. As said in a comment above, putting those dlopened libs in /lib/elektra/ should be much better. W: elektra-backend-berkeleydb no-documentation Safe to ignore. > > other comments: > > * --prefix=%{_prefix} and --exec-prefix=/ were unneeded in my tests > > This is correct. If removed, software won't be installed in /bin and /lib I guess you wanted to say incorrect. But it is not incorrect, the software is installed in /bin and /lib thanks to --bindir=/bin \ --libdir=/%{_lib} \ Have a look at the resulting variables in config.log. > The key.3.gz conflict was also removed. There is still /bin/kdb, kdb.{1,3}, kdb.h which are somehow generic but could be acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review