Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From avi@xxxxxxx 2006-05-27 08:37 EST ------- Please try the new src.rpm from http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/elektra/elektra-0.6.1-31.src.rpm (In reply to comment #25) > blockers: > * changelog > * source not found > * .so for libelekra should be in a devel package All three points fixed. > rpmlint output: > W: elektra incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.1-3 0.6.1-30 > E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-filesys.so libelektra-filesys.so > E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-fstab.so libelektra-fstab.so > W: elektra wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/elektra-0.6.1/standards/signature.xml > W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libelektratools.so > W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libelektra.so > W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libelektra-default.so > E: elektra script-without-shellbang > /usr/share/doc/elektra-0.6.1/scripts/convert-hwconfKudzu All coherent messages fixed. > other comments: > * --prefix=%{_prefix} and --exec-prefix=/ were unneeded in my tests This is correct. If removed, software won't be installed in /bin and /lib > * The redundant %doc line is not needed in devel subpackage: > %doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog README INSTALL Removed. The key.3.gz conflict was also removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review