[Bug 191014] Review Request: ganymed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ganymed


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014


bkonrath@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |overholt@xxxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From bkonrath@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-05-26 13:01 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> 
> > * Why have all those macro definitions, conditional and otherwise, at the top
> > instead of just...
> > %define gcj_support     1
> > ?
> 
> umm Ben Konrath added that part to my initial SPEC, I just thougth it was just
> to make easy to package it for RHEL

I just copied what our other eclipse packages do. Andrew, do you have any
thoughts here?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]