Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: musicbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192144 bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-20 13:32 EST ------- MD5Sums: 03f9eb2c446debd1e187d472c05dcad8 musicbox-0.2.3.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guide * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Desktop entry is fine * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * rpmlint produces no errors. * Builds fine in mock. Minor: * Unnecessary BuildRequirement: gtk2-devel (provided by libglade2-devel) * Don't package INSTALL doc, since it's the generic GNU file. You can fix the 2 minor issues when you import it into FE CVS. +1 APPROVE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review