Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-13 12:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15)and > This way you can specify a version of php to require. By all means, if a specific version of php is required, then list it as a requirement. Is that the case? I'm just saying don't list php as a requirement just because php-modules requies php. List the fewest requirements/dependencies as possible, and still be complete - let the dependency-resolver process do its job. :-) A general rule of thumb: do not list a dependency that is already a dependency of one of your dependents. So, if A depends on B, and B depends on C, it is not necessary (nor desirable) to list C as a dependent of A. If some special version of C (Cs) is required by A, then yes: A requires B A requires Cs B requires C Anyway... it's not my intention to take up a lot of bandwidth on 'depency theory'. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review