Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-05-07 06:02 EST ------- I've just approved the ctapi-common package (bug 190911). I guess Ville will import and build this soon. So we've "solved" the where to put the ctapi library issue. Please modify your package to install the library under %{_libdir}/ctapi and add: Requires: %{_libdir}/ctapi Also please remove the versioning (.0) from ctapi-cyberjack.so, but you should still pass the -soname flag to the linker, just without the .0, .so files should always should have an soname set. I'm not sure what todo with regards to soname versioning for the pcsc ifd-handler .so file. Ville do you know if these should be versioned or not? Once we have the versioning of the pcsc ifd-handler .so file figured out please create yet another version of your package. Sorry for the rough ride for your first package. As I already said you picked a hard one. Well concider this a good introduction to the review process and the general community process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review