Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-05-07 05:56 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: E: ctapi-common no-binary W: ctapi-common non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ctapi-x86_64.conf The error can be ignored, I don't know about the warning wine also drops a file under /etc/ld.so.conf.d and doesn't mark it config either, but that could actually be a wine packaging bug. I'll leave this one up to your discretion. * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (MIT) ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream NA, no upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns all dirs it should own * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains "code" only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * no gui -> no .desktop file required Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review