Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174952 jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx 2006-05-04 22:52 EST ------- rpmlint of lightning-1.2-3.i386.rpm:E: lightning no-binary W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/ppc/fp.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/ppc/funcs.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/core.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/ppc/core.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/sparc/funcs.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/fp.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/sparc/asm.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/ppc/asm.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/i386/funcs.hW: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/fp-common.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/i386/fp.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/i386/core.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/asm.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/i386/asm.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/asm-common.hW: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/core-common.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/funcs.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/sparc/core.hW: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/funcs-common.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/sparc/fp.h These are all rather necessary for lightningize to lightningize something. (Which it seemed to do successfully) - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license is either GPL or LGPL both included and OK - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC5 (i386) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file This is something to add to the exclude x86_64 tracker. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review