Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 ------- Additional Comments From gemi@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-01 17:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > But ghc642-gtk requires ghc642, so what happens when one upgrades to ghc643? > I don't think it will be possible to rebuild all ghc built libs immediately > after a new ghc release typically. I see the problem... There is probably no better way out in the current state of affairs. However I just wanted to have written down for the posterity that I do consider it unsatisfactory :-) The package builds fine in mock. Installing the packages works and the demo programs build perfectly well. I find it a little annoying that the doc directories are: ghc642-gtk-0.9.10 ghc-gtk2hs-doc-0.9.10 More consistent would be: ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.10 ghc-gtk2hs-doc-0.9.10 This would mean, that the doc files would go in the ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.10 package which is currently. Is is possible however to install the subpackages without the main package. Probably one could make the package ghc642-gtk require ghc-gtk2hs, so that ghc-gtk2hs is always installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review