Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-01 16:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > Well that works, but then the problem is that ghc642-gconf will conflict with > > ghc641-gconf, etc. An alternative might be to make ghc-gtk2hs pull in all the > > subpackages perhaps? > Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of splitting off these packages? > > I wonder if this versioning scheme is really worth the effort. After all > there are no shared libraries, where compatibility packages would be > necessary. Of course everytime ghc gets updated, the dependent packages > must be rebuilt... But ghc642-gtk requires ghc642, so what happens when one upgrades to ghc643? I don't think it will be possible to rebuild all ghc built libs immediately after a new ghc release typically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review