Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glibrary-1.0.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188435 tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-05-01 12:07 EST ------- Much better! The one point (not a blocker) is that you can use: %{_datadir}/%{name}/ instead of %{_datadir}/%{name}/* Gives you the same end result. I try to avoid * wherever possible. Good: - rpmlint checks return: W: glibrary incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.1-2 1.0.1-1 E: glibrary script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/glibrary-1.0.1/README E: glibrary script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/glibrary-1.0.1/AUTHORS E: glibrary script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/glibrary-1.0.1/COPYING E: glibrary script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/glibrary-1.0.1/ChangeLog Make sure you bump your release number when you make a change. :) Also, you should chmod -x those doc files, so that rpmlint doesn't think that they are scripts. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled properly - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file ok (might consider adding an icon) All in all, this is much better. Just some minor changes to make before you build, but I'm convinced that you have a better grasp on things. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review