Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-29 16:49 EST ------- I have no issues with the svncpp name. I guess if you considered this to be an addon package for subversion you would call it subversion-cpp, but I'm not sure it fits into that category. I don't think you should go editing LICENSE.txt; it should be fine as is as long as it describes what is being licensed (which it does). As far as I can tell, the only remaining issue is this new rpmlint warning, which I've not encountered before so I'll include the full explanation: E: rapidsvn binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/rapidsvn ['/usr/lib64'] The binary or shared library defines `RPATH'. Usually this is a bad thing because it hardcodes the path to search libraries and so makes it difficult to move libraries around. Most likely you will find a Makefile with a line like: gcc test.o -o test -Wl,--rpath. Also, sometimes configure scripts provide a --disable-rpath flag to avoid this. No --disable-rpath in configure, but lots of one libtool and two g++ invocations that reference it. Unfortunately I'm not sure how to get rid of them; autoconf is completely opaque and hideous to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review