Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755 ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2006-04-29 16:21 EST ------- In answer to comment #17: Well, the package doesn't mention the license as being STL, but look at: http://www.mcda.org/help/stl.html and then diff it vs the license in this package and the first part is identical, then this package has "...and that the name of Keith Packard not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without specific, written prior permission. Keith Packard makes no representations about the suitability of this software for any purpose. It is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty." So I think it's much closer to the STL license than the MIT one. Any license gurus out there that can chime in? In refrence to comment #18: Which CVS repo are you looking at? I don't see any changes in the ones I looked at anytime recently (which might be after this release version I guess). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review