Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190070 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-27 12:58 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/par2cmdline.spec SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/par2cmdline-0.4-6.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > Issues: > spectool cannot fetch the upstream source; your Source: URL is wrong. Fixed, I think. I cannot reach dl.sourceforge.net at the present time. :-( > you perhaps include a quick description of a PAR2 file in %description? I modified it: "par2cmdline is a program for creating and using PAR2 files. PAR2 files are usually published in binary newsgroups, on Usenet. They apply the data-recovery capability concepts of RAID-like systems to the posting and recovery of multi-part archives. On Usenet, PAR2 files are posted together with multi-part archives. par2cmdline can detect and repair dammaged files using the corresponding PAR2 files." Perhaps somebody can help me to correct my english. I declare the hunt of frenchisms opened! ;) (I personnaly use it to repair files from binaries of Lost, season 2, which will not be on french TV until next year. But do not tell to anybody!) > Please use the recommended BuildRoot: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Done. > Please remove Distribution: SuSE 9.1. Sorry! Done. As you can see, I have adapted an existing (and trivial) spec file. > I'm not sure about your Obsoletes: and Provides:, but I'll assume you > have some previous package history that requires this. I'll ask the list > for a bit of guidance. I do not understand. parchive-1.1.4 exists in Fedora Extras 4. See ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/SRPMS/parchive-1.1-4.src.rpm par2cmdline provides the same functionalities as parchive, and has a symlink /usr/bin/par->par2. That's why I made this couple of Obsoletes:/Provides: Perhaps I am wrong. I must admit that I am not totally used with such a trick. > rpmlint complains: > You should remove the executable bits from these files in %build; Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review