Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-04-27 02:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128286) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128286&action=view) Improbed specfile (In reply to comment #3) > rpmlint output: > E: gnucap configure-without-libdir-spec > > - The configure script was not created by autoconf, and does not > respond to a --libdir flag. > > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos2.cc ../d_mos2.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos4.cc ../d_mos4.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos6.cc ../d_mos6.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos1.cc ../d_mos1.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos7.cc ../d_mos7.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos5.cc ../d_mos5.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos3.cc ../d_mos3.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_bjt.cc ../d_bjt.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos.cc ../d_mos.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_diode.cc ../d_diode.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos_base.cc ../d_mos_base.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos123.cc ../d_mos123.cc > > - The build system compiles against symlinks to the actual source files, which > seems to confuse rpmbuild when it creates the debuginfo package. You might > try using hardlinks instead of softlinks to work around this. > I noticed this too, this also came up during a review by me of kismet which generates the same warnings. We (I and the kismet packager) concider this an rpmbuild bug and have bugzilla'd it, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189928 > QUESTIONS > ========= > * There seems to be two home pages for gnucap. The one listed in the > spec file at www.gnu.org lists 0.31 as the most recent version. But > a similarly looking page at http://www.geda.seul.org/tools/gnucap > shows 0.34. Why the two home pages? > I noticed this too, it seems that gnucap @ gnu is dead, and that the geda project has taken it over. > MUSTFIX > ======= > * Add %{?_smp_mflags} to 'make'. Intial tests show that it builds fine > with this flag. > Hmm, unfortunatly I don't remember if I left that out on purpose or by accident, since there is no comment about it (there is in gcompris.spec) I'll assume it was left out by accident and have put it in, this builds fine for me too. As usual during CET office hours I'm behind a machine which doesn't have upload access to my homepage, so I've attached the modified specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review