Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 ------- Additional Comments From wart@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-27 01:42 EST ------- rpmlint output: E: gnucap configure-without-libdir-spec - The configure script was not created by autoconf, and does not respond to a --libdir flag. W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos2.cc ../d_mos2.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos4.cc ../d_mos4.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos6.cc ../d_mos6.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos1.cc ../d_mos1.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos7.cc ../d_mos7.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos5.cc ../d_mos5.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos3.cc ../d_mos3.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_bjt.cc ../d_bjt.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos.cc ../d_mos.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_diode.cc ../d_diode.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos_base.cc ../d_mos_base.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos123.cc ../d_mos123.cc - The build system compiles against symlinks to the actual source files, which seems to confuse rpmbuild when it creates the debuginfo package. You might try using hardlinks instead of softlinks to work around this. MUST ==== * Package and spec file named appropriately * GPL license ok, license file included * spec file legible and in Am. English * Sources match upstream: 0d346f02a38c544fda6f8d7ec4f8b45e gnucap-0.34.tar.gz * Compiles and builds in mock on: FC4-i386, FC4-x86_64, FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64 * No excessive BR: * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Does not create any directories that it should own * No duplicate %files * %clean ok * Contains code, not content * %doc ok * No -devel package needed * No .desktop file needed QUESTIONS ========= * There seems to be two home pages for gnucap. The one listed in the spec file at www.gnu.org lists 0.31 as the most recent version. But a similarly looking page at http://www.geda.seul.org/tools/gnucap shows 0.34. Why the two home pages? MUSTFIX ======= * Add %{?_smp_mflags} to 'make'. Intial tests show that it builds fine with this flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review