[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: initng


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459





------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-04-24 08:18 EST -------
* I think, the old vs. recent SELinux API check should be implemented
  in the upstream package (I do not know, whether cmake is powerful
  enough for that). Else, I would not use 'rpm -q ...' but check the
  required feature. E.g. with

  | grep -q only-in-old-api /usr/include/selinux/selinux.h && API=OLD || API=
  | cmake . -D${API}SELINUX:BOOL=ON ...

  But I really do not know for what the OLDSELINUX/SELINUX flag is
  used and can not tell the exact string for 'only-in-old-api'.

* there should be appended a '|| :' to the

  | /usr/sbin/semanage ...
  | /sbin/restorecon ...

  calls in %post and %postun, and perhaps '2>/dev/null' too. 'semanage'
  is not available for FC4.

* %postun is buggy; '/sbin/ldconfig' must be moved into the body:

  | %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
  | /usr/sbin/semanage ...


* just a minor tweak: use

  | %install
  | rm -rf %{buildroot} _doc
                        ~~~~

* the

  | %post
  | ...
  | exit 0

  is useless; either %post reached the 'exit 0'; then the last command
  succeeded with exit code '0' and the complete script will exit with
  0. Or, a command failed; then the complete script will abort
  immediately without seeing the 'exit 0'.

* not really wrong, but the '-r' flag can/should be omitted:

  | %install
  | ...
  | rm -rf %{buildroot}/sbin/killall5



Else:

* when you want a full review, then provide a complete .src.rpm.

* how mature is the i-files syntax? When scripts will have to be
  rewritten for e.g. 0.70, this will stop me from approving it...

  Resp.: when published now, can you guarantee, that
  a) package follows upstream releases, and
  b) a nightly 'smart update' to a new version will not bring the
     system into an unusable state?

* when attaching spec files to the ticket, a 'text/plain' type shall 
  be assigned instead of 'application/octet-stream'


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]