Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx 2006-04-23 17:35 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint checks return: W: anjuta-gdl one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig W: anjuta-gdl one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig W: anjuta-gdl-debuginfo objdump-failed E: anjuta-gdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/gdl-0.6.0/gdl/gdl-recent.h E: anjuta-gdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/gdl-0.6.0/gdl/gdl-recent.c E: anjuta-gdl-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: anjuta-gdl-devel no-documentation None of these are blockers. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled by %find_lang - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.