Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177106 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-23 08:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > The differences are surprisingly small. The only significant difference is the > direction of drawing arcs. This can be compensated by changing one line in > libgeda. Now I am testing the libgeda with gd 2.0.33 and it seems that it is > working fine. So in my opinion libgdgeda can be dropped completly. The only > problem now is that nor gd or libgd.so.2 is in REQUIRES. You're saying you've replaced libgdgeda-devel with gd-devel as the buildreq for libgeda and the resulting package doesn't have an auto-dep on libgd.so.2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.