Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 bugs.michael@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael@xxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael@xxxxxxx 2006-04-23 07:41 EST ------- * Until raptor-devel will be good, this one BuildRequires: libxslt-devel * Run rpmlint on the binary rpms: Lots of output, in particular because the included "examples" %doc directory contains arch-dependent files (it MUST NOT), including unfinished libtool based executables in the hidden .libs directory, object files, and dependency meta data files in the hidden .deps directory. * rpmqfcheck.pl /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/liblrdf-0.4.0-3.i386.rpm Orphaned dir: /usr/share/ladspa Orphaned dir: /usr/share/ladspa/rdf * Source0 would be directly downloadable if in the form: http://download.sourceforge.net/... or http://dl.sf.net/... * Static libraries should not be included. * Noticable compiler warnings: showdefaults.c:42: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int' setting_test.c:43: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int' lrdf.c:596: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'raptor_new_uri' differ in signedness lrdf.c:597: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'raptor_new_uri' differ in signedness -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.