On Friday 06 July 2012 13:19:15 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On 07/06/2012 02:20 AM, Brendan Jones wrote: > > On 5/07/2012 5:05 PM, Clark Williams wrote: > >> Is there a plan for getting ardour3 packaged? I realize it's just beta > >> now but I've been using it to record drum tracks (between 8 and 12 > >> channels) with great success. > >> > >> Didn't know if we were just going to wait for it to be released and > >> have it replace ardour2 or if it would make sense to have ardour3 as a > >> separate package for a while... > > > > Upstream is not keen on distros packaging it. Other repos out there > > completely disregard this, but I don't think we should. > > I agree... > > > IT'll happen very soon I think (final beta was called - see how that > > goes) > > I'm actually packaging it internally at CCRMA for testing, test spec > file available on request... > -- Fernando Perhaps ardour3 belongs in rawhide? Seems like a Fedora(TM) thing to do... might as well let the testers start testing. Christopher
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ music mailing list music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
