Re: Default Desktop Environment

[Brian Monroe <briancmonroe@xxxxxxxxx>]

IMHO we should use a DE that uses as little resources as possible. I think it would be reasonable to try to aim for a <10ms lag for the spin on most systems. And on some of the older ones, that may just not be possible with some of the bulkier desktop enviornments. Obviously we won't be able to help everyone have the apps run like they were in a Pro Audio studio, but we should try, within reason, to free up as much resources as possible to leave room to run samples and effects. But that's just my own 2 cents. 

On the flipside, I wonder how hard it would be, to do a multiple desktop disk like the recent Fedora releases have been. Like having a performance mode, and a "shiny" one.

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Brendan Jones <brendan.jones.it@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 02/11/2012 05:05 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
..

On the other hand, I have a feeling that whoever spends the most
effort to build the spin, gets the choose the default DE. At least
this is the way things usually go in the free software world.

Doesn't have to be that way. Most of what I do tends to be driven by purely selfish motives. However it would be nice to know that I'm pleasing more than one person ;) I mean anyone can create a kickstart file right?

Best,
Orcan

_______________________________________________
music mailing list
music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music

_______________________________________________
music mailing list
music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music