On 07/29/2010 06:29 PM, Lloyd Kvam wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 07:59 +1000, David Timms wrote: >> 1. Does no one else see this issue ? > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > This is the usual argument against munging. I do not have any strong > feelings either way. The mailman documentation urges no munging and > that's what I've followed on the lists I administer. It's also the > policy on most of the lists to which I subscribe. > > The main argument for munging as best I can understand is that reply and > reply-all will both go to the list. There is no choice. I've also > encountered people who object to the duplication of getting a direct > reply *and* a copy from the list. My email program (Evolution) seems to > do a reasonable job of suppressing the duplicates. > > > I had not realized that many replies were getting lost. > I'm with Lloyd on this one. Thunderbird gives me two buttons: "reply," and "reply list." It's pretty straight-forward. As for whether the list should have an owner is an entirely different issue. Christopher. _______________________________________________ music mailing list music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
