On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 07:59 +1000, David Timms wrote: > 1. Does no one else see this issue ? http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html This is the usual argument against munging. I do not have any strong feelings either way. The mailman documentation urges no munging and that's what I've followed on the lists I administer. It's also the policy on most of the lists to which I subscribe. The main argument for munging as best I can understand is that reply and reply-all will both go to the list. There is no choice. I've also encountered people who object to the duplication of getting a direct reply *and* a copy from the list. My email program (Evolution) seems to do a reasonable job of suppressing the duplicates. I had not realized that many replies were getting lost. -- Lloyd Kvam Venix Corp DLSLUG/GNHLUG library http://dlslug.org/library.html http://www.librarything.com/catalog/dlslug http://www.librarything.com/rsshtml/recent/dlslug http://www.librarything.com/rss/recent/dlslug _______________________________________________ music mailing list music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
