Thank you Niels, for the feedback. On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Niels Mayer wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> >> > guitarix-0.07.1 (failed): >> >> I also tried to update guitarix to 0.07.1. However this version >> >> requires zita-resampler, which doesn't exist in Fedora yet. But it >> >> exists in PlanetCCRMA. Maybe we should build guitarix 0.07.1 on >> >> PlanetCCRMA until we get zita-resampler into Fedora (which may take a >> >> while since I am really busy these days. If anyone wants to give a >> >> hand I would be very happy). > > I'm intrigued by guitarix && would like to see it's interface to jconvolver > be more useful (there's always jcgui, which seems to be the jconvolver parts > of guitarix minus the "the knob goes to 11 so it's really loud" :-) part.). > IMHO both should be part of fedora since they're basically the same > "pattern" with the same dependencies. > The thing that would help w/ guitarix/jcgui's usage of jconvolver would be > better-working examples & hints for loading them up within the app... see > also http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.audio.planetccrma.general/9587 ;. > How can I help? The issue is, it takes time to get packages reviewed since there are about 700 review requests pending. If we had 2 people on Fedora (1 will package, 1 will review) then things would go faster. But as 1 person, I am packaging stuff and waiting some external person to take time to review the package. a2jmidi, for instance, I submitted it for review months ago and nobody looked at it yet. But I can't force anyone to become a packager. It takes time to learn and get into it, especially if the person does not have some programming background. I am just announcing here, if there is anyone who can spare a couple hours every week and is willing to do packaging work, we would be very pleased. > FYI, I have not received reply regarding access to some of the jconvolver > files: Yeah, I don't know of an email address of him that he checks and replies emails. I tried a couple addresses of him I found here and here but no luck still. > PS: Here's my overall installation "method" for these updates. (Btw, what > should I do to get rid of the --nogpgcheck option > when i don't want to include the updates-testing repo, and prefer to do it > "manually" as below, yet would also like a GPG check of package integrity: When the updates get signed and put into updates-testing repo (takes a couple days after my announcements), you can temporarily enable the updates-testing repo for once to install specific packages, like $ yum --enablerepo updates-testing update muse $ yum --enablerepo updates-testing install ladspa-wasp-plugins etc. When this command finishes its work, your updates-testing repo will be disabled. Cheers, Orcan _______________________________________________ music mailing list music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
