On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 05:40 -0700, Anthony Green wrote: > Ant wrote: > > Transaction Check Error: > > file /usr/share/locale/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/gtk_ardour.mo conflicts > > between attempted installs of ardour2-2.0-1.fc6.ccrma and > > ardour-0.99.3-8.fc6 > [lots deleted] > > file /usr/share/locale/sv_SE/LC_MESSAGES/libardour.mo conflicts > > between attempted installs of ardour2-2.0-1.fc6.ccrma and > > ardour-0.99.3-8.fc6 > > > > But thats what the current thread is about, having both versions? > > Ugh.. I guess upstream was wrong when they said you can install both > ardour 0.99.3 and ardour 2 in parallel. > > Nando, what do you think? One solution would be to drop the .mo files > from the proposed ardour0, have it depend on ardour (2), and hope that > the messages are backwards compatible. This is something I don't understand, looks like a bug (feature?) in yum?. I have both installed in fc6. So I erased them and tried: install both in the same transaction: fails install ardour, then install ardour2: fine install ardour2, then install ardour: fine Argh... So... install, say, ardour and then go for planetccrma-apps (I'll erase "ardour" from the meta package later - for now). -- Fernando _______________________________________________ Fedora-music-list mailing list Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list
