Re: LADSPA plugins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 22:40 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> One thing of note, is we seem to have settled into a NAME-dssi naming
> convention for DSSI plugins. Seems technically inconsistent but I
> suppose the difference is ladspa packages usually contain a whole bunch
> of plugins, whereas a dssi plugin tends to be just one.

It should be dssi-NAME
The reverse is more difficult to search in a list of packages, or simply
when you do an 'ls' in a directory.

It's just common sense, the least specific denominator must come first,
as in the YYYYMMDD format which preserves the order.

-- 
Florin Andrei

http://florin.myip.org/

_______________________________________________
Fedora-music-list mailing list
Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Users]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux