On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 16:43 -0400, Dan Easley wrote: > On 7/27/06, Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Now, here's my thoughts: this is a set of LADSPA plugins. It works > > strictly in conjunction with the package named "ladspa" - indeed, it is > > an extension to it. > > Therefore, I believe that the name of the plugins package should include > > the string "ladspa" somewhere. Examples: > > > > ladspa-swh-plugins > > > > Or perhaps even more logical: > > > > ladspa-plugins-swh > > for what it's worth, i agree completely. So, is there a consensus? What is it? I would go for: ladspa-plugins-NAME What if the name of the package already contains "plugins"? -- Fernando _______________________________________________ Fedora-music-list mailing list Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list
